Prediction of Cecil Mamiit vs Zack Fleishman Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Mamiit vs Z. Fleishman

Cecil Mamiit

PHI

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

5'8" (173 cm)

Height

6'2" (188 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

105

Best Rank

127

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$29.5K

Career Money

$100.3K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Zack Fleishman

USA

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

5'8" (173 cm)

Height

6'2" (188 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

105

Best Rank

127

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$29.5K

Career Money

$100.3K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Mamiit 1 - 1 Fleishman

They have played 6 sets in total, with Cecil Mamiit winning 3 and Zack Fleishman winning 3. The last match between Zack Fleishman and Cecil Mamiit was at the The Swanston Challenger - Sacramento, 10-10-2006, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Zack Fleishman getting the victory 5-7 6-1 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Mamiit	1
Fleishman	1

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(R1) The Swanston Challenger - Sacramento(10-10-06)

Stats

Zack Fleishman

Cecil Mamiit

(QF) USTA Challenger of Oklahoma - Tulsa(09-29-06)

Stats

Cecil Mamiit

Zack Fleishman

C. Mamiit vs Z. Fleishman H2H Profile

C. Mamiit	Stats	Z. Fleishman
$29,545	Career Prize Money	$100,345
53.25% (393-345)	Career Total W/L	51.99% (222-205)
1	Hard	1
7	Titles	3
1	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

C. Mamiit vs Z. Fleishman Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cecil Mamiit has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Zack Fleishman has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cecil Mamiit, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Zack Fleishman has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Cecil Mamiit has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zack Fleishman has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Cecil Mamiit has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Zack Fleishman winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Cecil Mamiit has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 59/45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 39% (W/L 11/17). Zack Fleishman has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 57% (W/L 14/10), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 21/25).
Player level: In the last year, Cecil Mamiit has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Zack Fleishman has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Cecil Mamiit winning 1 times and Zack Fleishman being victorious 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Cecil Mamiit winning 3 and Zack Fleishman winning 3.
The last match between Cecil Mamiit and Zack Fleishman was at the The Swanston Challenger - Sacramento, 10-10-2006, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Zack Fleishman getting the victory 5-7 6-1 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Deciding set H2H prediction: Cecil Mamiit and Zack Fleishman have played a deciding set 2 times, with Cecil Mamiit winning 1 times and Zack Fleishman 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cecil Mamiit has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Zack Fleishman has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cecil Mamiit has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zack Fleishman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Cecil Mamiit has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zack Fleishman has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Cecil Mamiit vs Zack Fleishman Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. Mamiit vs Z. Fleishman H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. Mamiit	Stats	Z. Fleishman
1	H2H Matches Won	1
3	Sets Won	3
24	Games Won	29
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
50% (1/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	50% (1/2)
50% (1/2)	Deciding Set Win %	50% (1/2)
50% (1/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
50% (1/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	50% (1/2)

Recent Performance Stats

C. Mamiit Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
USA F7 - 12-03-2012
R2 Pedro ZerbiniP. Zerbini	L	1-6 6-1 6-3	Stats
R1 Bassam BeidasB. Beidas	W	7-5 7-5	Stats
Davis Cup, Group I, PO, PHI-TPE 2-3 - 12-09-2011
Rubber 1 Ti ChenT. Chen	L	6-7(2) 6-2 7-6(6) 6-3	Stats
Farmers Classic - Los Angeles - 25-07-2011
Q1 Tim SmyczekT. Smyczek	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
Davis Cup, Group I, 1R, PHI-JPN 1-3 - 28-02-2011
Rubber 4 Go SoedaG. Soeda	L	7-6(5) 6-2 3-6 6-3	Stats

View All

Z. Fleishman Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
U.S. Open - New York - 29-08-2011
Q1 Vincent MillotV. Millot	L	4-6 6-4 6-2	Stats
Rogers Cup - Montreal - 08-08-2011
Q1 Alejandro FallaA. Falla	L	6-7(2) 6-2 6-2	Stats
Farmers Classic - Los Angeles - 25-07-2011
Q1 Sahr Timothy KpulunS. Timothy	L	6-2 3-1 ret.	Stats
Wimbledon - London - 20-06-2011
Q1 Marc GicquelM. Gicquel	L	6-4 6-2	Stats
U.S. Open - New York - 31-08-2009
Q1 Mikhail KukushkinM. Kukushkin	L	6-1 6-3	Stats

View All

C. Mamiit vs Z. Fleishman Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. Mamiit	Stats	Z. Fleishman
53.25% (393/345)	YTD Win/Loss	51.99% (222/205)
53.14% (947/835)	Sets Win/Loss	50.89% (513/495)
51.36% (8668/8209)	Games Win/Loss	50.47% (4898/4807)
55.27% (278/225)	Hard Win/Loss	52.61% (151/136)
44.79% (43/53)	Clay Win/Loss	45.65% (21/25)
54.95% (61/50)	Indoor Hard W/L	51.43% (36/34)
39.29% (11/17)	Grass Win/Loss	58.33% (14/10)
0.01	Aces Per Game	0.04
104	Aces Total	209
0.01	Double Faults Per Game	0.03
78	Total Double Faults	136
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
479.77	Average Opponent Rank	486.43
56% (1318/2358)	1st Serve %	54% (1576/2919)
68% (891/1318)	1st Serve Win %	69% (1092/1576)
49% (514/1043)	2nd Serve Win %	49% (662/1343)
40% (85/210)	Break Points Won % (Total)	43% (91/214)
38% (893/2364)	Return Points Win %	36% (998/2795)
38.89% (21/33)	Slam W/L	43.59% (17/22)
43.59% (17/22)	Masters W/L	28.57% (2/5)
50.00% (9/9)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
46.15% (78/91)	Main Tour W/L	53.16% (42/37)
58.35% (255/182)	Challenger W/L	51.36% (132/125)
61.90% (13/8)	Futures W/L	64.44% (29/16)
55% (372/679)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	52% (214/413)
35% (16/46)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	50% (4/8)
53% (132/249)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	49% (81/166)
48% (120/252)	Deciding Set Win %	54% (80/149)
80% (406/324)	1st Set Won, Won Match	85% (216/183)
20% (406/81)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	15% (216/32)
20% (331/66)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	18% (210/37)